I apologize in advance for posting so late.
A great lede is one that compels a reader’s interest to read the entire story. A great lede lets the reader know why it’s an important story without giving everything away.
A bad lede is one that does nothing to interest the reader, confuses them or simply explains nothing about the story.
I don’t tend to think I am seasoned enough as a writer to say that I have written a “great” lede yet. Nevertheless, one that I am especially proud of came from a story I wrote last fall for Reznetnews.org. The story was about the damming of the Klamath River and the ramifications it has had on one of the tribal communities that are along the river:
“A tiny boat carried three teenagers to the mouth of the Klamath River on a bright, chilly afternoon. There, the river’s clear, fresh water empties into the mighty Pacific Ocean.
The students from Klamath, Calif., went to that spot last spring to fish and catch eels as part of a cultural program offered by their high school and the Yurok Tribe Fisheries Program.
The trip wasn’t just another school activity. As Yuroks, they sought to preserve their culture, which, like the river, is struggling to survive.”
I like the lede of Ex. 3 the most. It was a unique lede for a story that I would be compelled to read (sounds like a fascinating one) I would like to use this style of summarizing a person (kind of like a mini-profile) for a story in the future.
Each of the example ledes deals with the conclusion of something; retirement, death, sentencing and coverage of a huge sporting event.